Tuesday, March 12, 2019

Genetically Modified Foods Essay

Scientists have knowing how to modify nourishments in the last decades of the twentieth century. That is, they have learned to fudge the deoxyribonucleic acid of plants and animals. Scientists were able to transfer a trait from one beingness to another by splicing the DNA of one organism into the DNA of another organism (Introduction). This process changes the genetic makeup of plants and labels these adapted foods genetically modified organisms. victuals should not be genetically modified because of the wasted food cited and the potential long-term health issues for consumers.Genetic alteration of food in the United States began in 1987 with field-testing of tobacco and tomato plants ( invoice). One example of this process would be producing a tomato that is skanky to mildew and rot. This tomato would taste and look the same, besides would stay good longer. The farmer that grows this genetically modified tomato plant would benefit from a more hardy plant because he w ould not have as many wasted tomatoes (Introduction). A general assumption is that, with the self-aggrandising population of the world to solar day, genetically modified food is absolutely necessary.This is not true. Ethan A. Huff, a writer for Natural News, says in his article, Dont call up the Lie Organic Farming CAN Feed the World, that, organic agriculture by itself is fully capable of provisionsing the world. Huff also says that overawe and sheep were meant to eat grass from pastures instead of the genetically modified soy, corn, and grains factory farmers are feeding them. The grains add together to the animals make them sick and require a prominent amount of resources to produce.If these animals were allowed to graze naturally, in grasses that are not part of the mankind diet anyway, the grains currently being fed to them could be used for man consumption. Huff also cites benignants wasting food as a major issue. He states that, one-third of the worlds food ends u p in the trash heap as waste. He states that, specifically in developed nations, wad tend to purchase more food than their families crumb consume before the food goes bad. With so much wasted food, genetically modified food is not needed.The health risks convoluted with genetically modifying food are potentially dangerous. Several animal studies indicate serious health risks associated with GM food, including infertility, immune problems, accelerated aging, insulin regulation, and changes in major organs and the GI system (Genetically). One way of plants are being genetically modified is engineering corn and cotton to produce their own pesticide. This pesticide, called Bt, was produced from stain bacteria and has a history of safe use.In countries such as India and Germany, large numbers of animals died after consuming plants genetically modified to produce Bt. Thousands of sheep died after grazing on Bt cotton plants. In a recap study, all sheep fed these modified cotton pla nts died within thirty days. In a small village in Andhra Pradesh, buffalo grazed on cotton plants for eight years without incident. On January 3rd, 2008, the buffalo grazed on Bt cotton plants for the first time. All 13 were sick the next day all died within 3 days (Genetically). Other ramifications allow in issues with reproduction.Tests in animals show that possibilities include premature deliveries, abortions, infertility, prolapsed uteruses, sterility, and death of newborns. When male rats were fed genetically modified soy, their testicles actually changed colorfrom the normal pink to dark blue. (Genetically). In humans, in the US population, the incidence of low birth weight babies, infertility, and infant mortality are escalating (Genetically). With all the complications in test animals, it is a wonder how more people are not concerned well-nigh eating genetically modified food. Others may disagree.Potentially life-sustaining foods gutter be grown quickly and in a short put of time to feed many, which is true, but the truth is that, in testing, these methods of creating foods have through with(p) more harm to test subjects than good. Some experts claim that genetically altered foods create biodiversity instead of edging out their more natural cousins, but others argue that biodiversity with lab-created plants are actually killing off non-genetically altered species of plants (Carpenter). A more reasonable approach might be that people should dispirit to be more conscious of what they purchase and discard because it has gone bad.A more prudent use of the worlds food supply might benefit more people than any other alternative. circumscribe food may seem tyrannical, but if humans keep generating so much food waste because of the tendency to buy more than is needed, circumscribe may become the norm. Another alternative, however, and a less harsh one, would be for people to grow their own vegetables. If gardens were as plentiful nowadays as they wer e in the 1940s, the growth of so many genetically altered vegetables would be unnecessary. In conclusion, there are many more options available to people than going into a laboratory to change how food is grown.With all of the risks involved in genetically altered food, maybe even ones that are not known because of the relative newness of the research available, it is unfathomable that another way to feed the world has yet been found. Would doing more work on an individual origination really be so bad compared to the potentially life-threatening health problems that todays scientists are unintentionally giving to the future of the human race? Works Cited Carpenter, Janet E. Genetically Engineered Crops Have Had a Positive carry on on Biodiversity. Biodiversity. Ed. Debra A. Miller.Detroit Greenhaven Press, 2013. Current Controversies. Rpt. from Impacts of GE Crops on Biodiversity. ISB News Report. 2011. debate Viewpoints in Context. Web. 24 Nov. 2013. Genetically Modified Foods Pose Huge Health Risk. Opposing Views. 20 May 2009. Web. 20 Nov. 2013. History of Genetic Engineering. American receiving set Works. American Public Media. 2013. Web. 24 Nov. 2013. Introduction to Genetically Modified Food At Issue. Genetically Engineered Foods. Ed. Nancy Harris. San Diego Greenhaven Press, 2009. At Issue. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 20 Nov. 2013.

No comments:

Post a Comment