'Interactional View Theory Essay\r'

'This guess states that within family relationships there dirty dog often be misconceptions between each(prenominal) family division and the problem cigaret only be transformed when addressed by pop(a)side members of the family (or speckle), or simply stepping outside the situation yourselves and looking at all possible aspects that way, or reframing. Watzlawick claims that through the repetitive actions of a family system, a self-­regulating, inter-­depending meshwork of feedback loops guided by member’s rules, we dispose to stick to a status quo, or a family homeostasis, when dealing with issues within our families.\r\nIn doing that, we often mechanically assume, or consecrate a label on, a situation to be how we see it from our personal views earlier than looking at the intact picture and e trulyvirtuoso’s views who are involved. erst we take that outside-­looking-­in memory access we chip in to take into contemplation two sides of the dialogue in the situation: the content of the situation, the report spark off of a message (verbally), and the relationship between members communicating, the hold in part of a message (nonverbally). In doing this as well as analyzing all aspects of the situation we bay window eventually come to an agreement on how to set most and solve the positive issue.\r\nGrowing up with a health practitioner as a parent, get sick is never anyone elses fault but your give birth and sympathy is almost never present in those situations. I recently had an extreme food-­ drunkenness hazard which caused much carnage in my family, but the serve up of analyzing and solving this issue is a meliorate model of Watzlawick’s guess. A few years ago my mom obstinate to go back to civilize and study healthy subsisting, diet, and the\r\nways of an organic, raw vegan. This changed her whole life, my whole pan turn up, and the way she approached almost any situation. Anytime somethin g does not go the way it should having to do with my body, energy, moods, etc. if I go to my mom for advice the answer is always about(predicate) diet, sleep patterns, or other healthy living styles. Which is accurate and understandable to a authentic period but, in mine and my stepdad’s spirits, it does not use to all(prenominal) situation.\r\nI do eat very healthy compa going to the average person and I try to not eat a lot of m chow chow, and especially not red meats, but on occassion I do enjoy treating myself to, what I call, a â€Å" sell meal.” A few months back when visiting friends out of town, I decided to go all out and try this â€Å"world-­historied” burger at a topical anesthetic burger joint. Might I say, it was quite the burger, but the event was seven days of pure distaste, pain, and regret. Of course when attack to my mom for advice on the situation she immediately put all blame on me for not choosing â€Å" sagely” on my foo d decisions. My stepdad, on the other hand, eats a good amount of red meats and had rattling been to this particular restaurant many times before, having no issues.\r\nHe said i probably in effect(p) got a bug from touching the â€Å"world famous” burger joint door handles and putting my hand to my face, or something of that sort. My take on the situation was different from both of theirs. I thought it was all in my mind because I am typically against eating red meats and i violated my self morals and so ca apply me to feel guilty to an extent where I caused myself to genuinely be sick. Hearing each member’s take on the situation caused havoc and an unnecessary issue that drove away from the actual problem. Until we all sat down and open-­ tending(p)ly listened to each person’s reasoning did we all realize how slaphappy the whole situation was, and how no one actually knew the official cause of my illness but statement about what might be because of our personal stances was in effect(p) silly and almost irrelevant. When approaching the situation, as Watzlawick predicted in his conjecture, my mom, stepdad, and\r\nI, originally, all took our individual opinions and pushed them on one other assuming that they were the only way. My mom dictum the my stepdad was an enabler, one whose non-­assertive behavior allows others to continue in an colony or other wrong-­doing, and in defending himself, my stepdad saying she was biased because of her personal beliefs on eating habits.\r\nOnce we agreed to sit down and talk about each person’s perspective on things using metacommunication, communication about communication, and taking into consideration why each of us acted a certain way and how it might leave affected the others, we could at last come to agreement and be at peace. We decided that if we all would have approached each other in a more than open-­minded, understanding manner using one-­across communication, conversational moves used to neutralize or level control within the exchange, rather than essay to one-­up communicate, place conversational moves on each other to gain control of the exchange, with each other, it would have been a symmetrical interchange, an interaction based on equal power, and the conflict might not have happened at all.\r\nI find the Interactional assure Theory to be quite on point, and though Griffin found much to critique I might have to disagree and say, while the guess may not be absolutely perfect and one-­hundred percent accurate in every situation, it does apply to most of, at least, my family controversies, for example, this particular incident. From this theory I was made informed of how often I am to quickly ignore my parents’ responses as sign reactions to them being repetitive and almost biased in their advice, and how I can be more open-­minded in those situations. I was also made aware of how to think and approach my parents i n certain situations, much(prenominal) as food poisoning, to trigger a more calm and open-­minded response from them. I enjoyed reading, comparing, and analyzing this theory and will begin to consciously apply it to my forthcoming conversations with my family members as I did in the food poisoning example, but this time before the incident can happen or get worse.\r\n'