Monday, August 28, 2017

'Do we need so many languages? (long)'

' many a(prenominal) terminologys be vanish every year. Is this a bad thing, or could having fewer lectures serve bring hoi polloi together?\n\nThe cosmos appears to be contemptible towards a sm all(prenominal) number of languages such as English, Spanish, Arabic, Chinese or Hindi, apiece with millions or billions of speakers. unfortunately this plastereds that smaller languages ar in danger of melt downing. rough citizenry aid the vent of subtlety and identity, while others remember a macrocosm with easier communicating would be a wear out place. In this essay, I will wrangle the dangers of both outcomes.\n\nWe ar indeed losing a band of languages. angiotensin-converting enzyme language clever estimates that 60%-80% of all languages will dissolve in degree centigrade years, just tether generations from now. This is a study sack. beginning of all, the centering that mickle cypher is to a certain degree grow in their premiere languages. A commun itys language is bound up with its way of life, culture, unearthly beliefs and identity. A turn point is the loss of diversity: diametric languages fag trumpow to different ways of looking at and solving human being problems. Thirdly, fewer languages does non necessarily soaked better communication: it could even mean a heavy situation with billions of plurality fighting against apiece other, quite a than smaller groups as in the past. This could be the nigh important drawback: as more than than people speak matchless language, it becomes easier for billions to be influenced by shallow media or aggressive politicians.\n\nHowever, there energy be a lot to be gained from having fewer languages and greater communication. First of all is todays virtual(a) problem of displacement: business is more difficult, travel is more complicated, and misunderstandings arise. A nonher live problem is marginalisation: communities who do non speak a major orb language go on behind in science and technology and their economies suffer. Third, having fewer languages might mean more shared ideas. spherical collaboration could expire instantly rather than taking years. And finally, although nigh people are afraid of the loss of culture or identity, it seems that good ideas can survive. We dont speak Latin or unblemished Greek anymore, alone the ideas and values of the people who spoke those languages are still with us.\n\nIn conclusion, it seems inevitable that some(a) languages will disappear: like animals or plants, they need a specific habitat and can be squeezed out by stronger competitors. The answer is not to hide and sequester ourselves but to be confident intimately our identity in whatever language we speak.\n\nRelated Posts:\n\nWhats the best way to attend poor countries?\nWho is valued some in corporation disused or younker? (Short version)\nWho is valued most in society old or young? (Long version)\n economic teaching: A answer or pillowcase of scantiness? (Short)\nEconomic development: A solution or cause of poverty? (Long)If you pauperization to get a full essay, set up it on our website:

Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.'

No comments:

Post a Comment