Did Mike Vick's Sentence Offend The Rule Of Law?

mike Vick, superstar quarterback of the Atlanta Falcons had it all; money, fame, respect, you stimulate it. He was one of the leagues most exciting players until April 2007, where in a blink of an eye, he lost it all. mike Vick was convicted and pleaded guilty of running game a chase conflict operation solely orthogonal his home in Virginia. Vick was responsible for the torture and mutilate of absolved dogs. He was immediately suspended by the NFL without even out and he lost his endorsement deals, eventually leading himself to bankruptcy. microphone was primarily destined to 5 years in prison, which was a fierceer sentence than usual, tho was released after 23 months. The question still ashes; did Mike Vicks harsher treatment offend the rule of jurisprudence? I would obligate to say that the rule of law was non pique in this case because in all honesty, Mike Vick got what he deserved. No one is above the law, and although Vick was given an singular sentence , a message was needed to be sent to other high-profile figures and celebrities.

existence such a powerful role pattern to youths, Vick should have been more responsible for his actions. That is why his sentence was worsened than it normally would have been. Vick was probably well aware that his dog fighting actions were illegal but he still move it. wherefore would someone with such a high reputation, loss to exuviate all of his accomplishments down the drain? His betrayal to the lot who looked up to him was inexcusable. Mike Vick was certainly displayed as immature and commanding in this case. The jury di d what was right to give a harsh sentence, t! o uphold Mike Vick and other celebrities realize their actions can contact others.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper