'Culture and Education Essay\r'

'When dealing with issues that link up to multitude’s beliefs and faith, one has to tread with caution. Although at that graze is religious liberty, one has to be c atomic number 18ful active religious issues when it grapples to public places. For one, I believe that faith is a personal thing and restrain should be put on it when we come to a place where other spate that are non of the akin religious belief are. Not that we are non at liberty to display our faith alone the integrity is that as we have right so do other people have rights excessively and our own faith should not overshadow theirs. However, in that location are some instances where we major power be in a dilemma of what to do.\r\nThe case provided is a dear(p) example of this scenario. Without recourse to emotions or sentiments, I cypher the board made a right end which has been long overdue. However, as expected, some people leave alone rebuff this decision because of some rather stirred up or sentimental reasons. Their argument go forth be will not be objective provided their rebuttal of the board’s decision will be patterned after the following argument. The federal agency of the parents who rebuffed the decision of the board will be grounded on the situation that the late principal deserves some abide by because he has toiled in that cultivate.\r\nThese parents will consider the pull through made by the board as annihilating to the late principal and thus will handle for the reversal. Apart from this, they might argue that the portrait has been an integral part of the tame tradition and that they consider the estimate of just waking up one daytime and deciding to remove what has been a part of the instill life and tradition rather absurd. â€Å"What do you expect the poor boy that painted the portrait to live? Imagine the number of hours the poor boy spent in painting that portrait. ”\r\nFurthermore, these parents may argue that since no one is complaining nigh the portrait, the portrait is not affecting the board. â€Å"Is it disturbing you or is it hindering the flake out of your duties? ” Question 2: A. Linda Mealey argued in her paper highborn â€Å"Bulking up: the roles of ride and depend onual orientation on attempts to manipulate physical attractiveness” that â€Å"Socialization processes do-nothing either reduce or enhance biologic differences between individuals or groups” Sex role socialisation and sexual orientation has led to stamps.\r\nThe more people are aware of their sexual orientation, the more they come to be identified with the general preconceived ideas about the sex. For example, if a lady believes in a assort about women generally, she comes to see herself from the point of view of this stereotype and this will make her naturally identify with people that fall under the same sexual orientation. Although, stereotypes might sometimes lead to discrimination of a sex, the truth is that it allows people that fall under the same sex to identify with each others as it serves as a unifying platform.\r\nB. There are some school roles that reinforce sex role stereotypes for girls. An example of this is the fact that the position of cheerleaders in the school football teams. This reinforces sex role stereotypes for the girls because they are made to feel that they smoke not meet up with the challenges that men do. some other example is that in some schools, the positions of vice-presidents of organizations are close for ladies.\r\nThis also reinforces sex role stereotypes that men are leaders and women should support them in whatever they do. Although these school roles might not be directly think to reinforce sex role stereotypes, the truth is that they do. quote: Mealey, L. â€Å"Bulking up: the roles of sex and sexual orientation on attempts to manipulate physical attractiveness” (1997) Retrieved on April 28, 2008 from http://findart icles. com/p/articles/mi_m2372/is_n2_v34/ai_19551975\r\n'